Saturday, February 28, 2009

Stream logo Sat. 2-28-09

I prefer the first in sherwin's variations (top-left). The tagline needs to be more legible. Micah's is cool but I worry about it holding up in all the applications. I am posting them so we can reply in the blog if necessary and also to keep a record. Somebody mentioned we should display our work (the class) in the exhibit. Somebody else said there should be a section about the class. Maybe it should be a display of all the work (process) that it takes to do the exhibit, from all perspectives: graphics, 3D, and organization. Send more, if any...



2 comments:

  1. I prefer the one on the top left as well. The discontinuity in the S, T, and E seems a little strange to me, though. I feel like the break in the A and M gives the desired effect (Stream lookin?) in itself, and the S, T, and E don't add much.

    Here's a suggestion:
    EXAMPLE

    But yeah, just a criticism for criticism's sake. Maybe at this point it's better to just say, "Yeah, that's cool!"?

    ReplyDelete
  2. i don't like any of those. The 20 kills everything. But I like the last one though...there's something to it. but I'm not sure if I like the font and the black color (...) it looks too simple of logo with the first letters (STRE..).

    I bought an album not long ago, it reminds it me of it (...)

    LINK:
    http://medias.lepost.fr/ill/2008/02/06/v-7-1095085-1202308649.png

    If we use this "splashing painting touch" it could look good and maybe the 20 could be worked with the "splashing effect"...

    ReplyDelete